![]() 03/04/2015 at 19:49 • Filed to: RATOTD | ![]() | ![]() |
!!! UNKNOWN CONTENT TYPE !!!
![]() 03/04/2015 at 19:52 |
|
Basically it used to correlate to it's payload in pounds, but the trucks got more capable and the terminology stuck.
![]() 03/04/2015 at 19:55 |
|
I was always told because it's a 1 half (500 being half 1000) ton, same with Ford and F150...
![]() 03/04/2015 at 20:43 |
|
I always thought it was just a model designation.
Before 1988 Chevy and GMC used C/K/R 10, 20, 30.
Dodge didn't switch from D/W 100, 150, 250 to the "1500" stuff until 1994.
![]() 03/04/2015 at 20:50 |
|
Are you saying a ton is 1000 lbs?
![]() 03/04/2015 at 21:02 |
|
I thought it was off of the name F-100, and then iterations just expanding upon the original number. Because, big numbers, right?
![]() 03/05/2015 at 00:15 |
|
No, just 500 is half of 1000...
Doesn't actually hold up though anyway, as by that metric 2 half tons (2500) should be a one ton, not 3/4...
But I always liked it anyway.
![]() 03/07/2015 at 16:57 |
|
When light-duty trucks were first produced in the United States, they were rated by their payload capacity in tons (e.g., 1 2 -, 3 4 - and 1-ton). Over time, payload capacities for most domestic pickup trucks have increased while the ton titles have stayed the same. The now-imprecise ton rating is presently used to compare standard sizes, rather than actual capacities.
From wiki.